Integritee Network-logo

Integritee Network

Integritee is a highly scalable, privacy-enabling network in the Polkadot ecosystem with parachains on Polkadot and Kusama. We seek to become the leading Web3 privacy solution - a blockchain network for developers and relevant to enterprises to build (decentralized) applications that benefit from unrivaled speed, verifiable confidentiality/privacy, and interoperability. At scale.

Polkadot
Blockchain
L2
Rust
C/C++
Python
Maximum Bounty
$10,000
Live Since
10 June 2024
Last Updated
10 June 2024
  • PoC required

Rewards

Integritee Network provides rewards in TEER on Polkadot, denominated in USD.

Rewards by Threat Level

Blockchain/DLT
Critical
USD $10,000
High
USD $5,000
Medium
USD $2,000
Low
USD $1,000

Rewards are distributed according to the impact of the vulnerability based on the Immunefi Vulnerability Severity Classification System V2.3.

Repeatable Attack Limitations

If the function where the vulnerability exists can be upgraded or paused, only the initial attack will be considered for a reward. This is because the project can mitigate the risk of further exploitation by upgrading or pausing the component where the vulnerability exists. The reward amount will depend on the severity of the impact and the funds at risk.

Reward Payment Terms

Payouts are handled by the Integritee Network team directly and are denominated in USD. However, payments are done in TEER.

The calculation of the net amount rewarded is based on the average price between CoinMarketCap.com and CoinGecko.com at the time the bug report was submitted. No adjustments are made based on liquidity availability.

Program Overview

Integritee is a highly scalable, privacy-enabling network in the Polkadot ecosystem with parachains on Polkadot and Kusama. We seek to become the leading Web3 privacy solution - a blockchain network for developers and relevant to enterprises to build (decentralized) applications that benefit from unrivaled speed, verifiable confidentiality/privacy, and interoperability. At scale.

Our solution combines the security and trust of Polkadot, the scalability of second-layer solutions, and the confidentiality of Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) - a special-purpose hardware inside which computations run securely, confidentially, and verifiably. Our technology is relevant to both Web3 developers and enterprises who would like to benefit from verifiable privacy and public auditability.

For more information about Integritee Network, please visit https://www.integritee.network/

Integritee Network provides rewards in TEER, denominated in USD. For more details about the payment process, please view the Rewards by Threat Level section further below.

Responsible Publication

  • Integritee Network adheres to category 2 - Noticed Required. This Policy determines what information researchers are allowed to make public from their submitted bug reports. For more information about the category selected, please refer to our Responsible Publication page.

Primacy of Impact vs Primacy of Rules

  • Integritee Network adheres to the Primacy of Rules, which means that the whole bug bounty program is run strictly under the terms and conditions stated within this page.

Proof of Concept (PoC) Requirements

Known Issue Assurance

  • Integritee Network commits to providing Known Issue Assurance to bug submissions through their program. This means that Integritee Network will either disclose known issues publicly, or at the very least, privately via a self-reported bug submission.
  • In a potential scenario of a mediation, this allows for a more objective and streamlined process, in order to prove that an issue is known. Otherwise, assuming the bug report is valid, it would result in the report being considered as in-scope, and due a reward.

Public Disclosure of Known Issues

-Bug reports covering previously-discovered bugs (listed below) are not eligible for a reward within this program. This includes known issues that the project is aware of but has consciously decided not to “fix”, necessary code changes, or any implemented operational mitigating procedures that can lessen potential risk.

Feasibility Limitations

  • The project may be receiving reports that are valid (the bug and attack vector are real) and cite assets and impacts that are in scope, but there may be obstacles or barriers to executing the attack in the real world. In other words, there is a question about how feasible the attack really is. Conversely, there may also be mitigation measures that projects can take to prevent the impact of the bug, which are not feasible or would require unconventional action and hence, should not be used as reasons for downgrading a bug's severity.

Therefore, Immunefi has developed a set of feasibility limitation standards which by default states what security researchers, as well as projects, can or cannot cite when reviewing a bug report.

Immunefi Standard Badge

By adhering to Immunefi’s best practice recommendations, Integritee Network has satisfied the requirements for the Immunefi Standard Badge.

KYC not required

No KYC information is required for payout processing.

Proof of Concept

Proof of concept is always required for all severities.

Responsible Publication

Category 2: Notice Required

Prohibited Activities

Default prohibited activities
  • Any testing on mainnet or public testnet deployed code; all testing should be done on local-forks of either public testnet or mainnet
  • Any testing with pricing oracles or third-party smart contracts
  • Attempting phishing or other social engineering attacks against our employees and/or customers
  • Any testing with third-party systems and applications (e.g. browser extensions) as well as websites (e.g. SSO providers, advertising networks)
  • Any denial of service attacks that are executed against project assets
  • Automated testing of services that generates significant amounts of traffic
  • Public disclosure of an unpatched vulnerability in an embargoed bounty
  • Any other actions prohibited by the Immunefi Rules

Feasibility Limitations

The project may be receiving reports that are valid (the bug and attack vector are real) and cite assets and impacts that are in scope, but there may be obstacles or barriers to executing the attack in the real world. In other words, there is a question about how feasible the attack really is. Conversely, there may also be mitigation measures that projects can take to prevent the impact of the bug, which are not feasible or would require unconventional action and hence, should not be used as reasons for downgrading a bug's severity. Therefore, Immunefi has developed a set of feasibility limitation standards which by default states what security researchers, as well as projects, can or cannot cite when reviewing a bug report.