ZKsync OS-logo

ZKsync OS

|

The latest generation of the ZKsync protocol. Including the ZK prover (ZKsync Airbender), the STF (ZKsync OS) and the smart contracts that implement the protocol on-chain.

zkSync
Maximum Bounty
$100,000
Live Since
24 November 2025
Last Updated
22 September 2026
  • PoC Required

  • KYC required

Select the category you'd like to explore

Assets in Scope

Target
Primacy Of Impact
Name
Added on
22 September 2026
Target
Primacy Of Impact
Name
Added on
22 September 2026
Target
Name
Basic bootloader
Added on
22 September 2026
Target
Name
Basic system
Added on
22 September 2026
Target
Name
Callable oracles
Added on
22 September 2026
Target
Name
EVM interpreter
Added on
22 September 2026
Target
Name
Oracle provider
Added on
22 September 2026
Target
Name
Proof running system
Added on
22 September 2026
Target
Name
Storage models
Added on
22 September 2026
Target
Name
Delegated U256
Added on
22 September 2026
Target
Name
Modexp
Added on
22 September 2026
Target
Name
U256
Added on
22 September 2026

Impacts in Scope

Severity
Critical
Title

Direct theft of any user funds, whether at-rest or in-motion, other than unclaimed yield

Severity
Critical
Title

Protocol insolvency

Severity
Critical
Title

Permanent freezing of funds (that cannot be fixed by upgrade)

Severity
Critical
Title

Direct and publicly triggerable loss of funds

Severity
High
Title

Permanent stopping the priority queue

Severity
High
Title

Permanent freezing of funds (that can be fixed by upgrade)

Severity
High
Title

Underconstraints in the circuit that make invalid ZKsync OS executions provable

Severity
High
Title

Circuit, node, or program mismatches that make valid ZKsync OS executions unprovable and require verification key regeneration

Severity
Medium
Title

Theft of gas

Severity
Medium
Title

Undocumented deviation from EVM behavior

Severity
Medium
Title

Unbounded gas consumption

Severity
Medium
Title

Griefing (e.g. no profit motive for an attacker, but damage to the users or the protocol)

Out of scope

Program's Out of Scope information

The following ZKsync OS directories are out of scope because they are used for the Ethereum STF / Ethereum runner path, not the production ZKsync OS STF:

  • basic_bootloader/src/bootloader/transaction_flow/ethereum/
  • basic_bootloader/src/bootloader/block_flow/ethereum/
  • basic_system/src/system_implementation/ethereum_storage_model/

Only behavior reachable in the production ZKsync OS STF, built with the production feature set, is in scope. Reports that only affect the Ethereum STF, Ethereum runner, test-only configurations, or non-production feature sets are out of scope unless the report also demonstrates the same impact in the production ZKsync OS STF.

Smart Contract assets:

  • Any finding whose exploitation requires Gateway to be enabled and operating as a settlement layer is out of scope, since Gateway is not currently enabled and all chains settle directly to L1. This applies only to the Gateway precondition — the same code, when reachable by an L1-settling chain, stays in scope.
  • Broken link hijacking is out of scope.
  • Attacks requiring changing the verifier key.

Proving system:

  • Prover implementations and their supporting code are out of scope: zksync-airbender prover/, gpu_prover/, witness_eval_generator/, gpu_witness_eval_generator/, trace_holder/, worker/, fft/, and the zksync-crypto-gpu crates (shivini, proof-compression, zksync-gpu-prover). A prover bug produces a proof that fails verification.
  • Witness generation, benchmarking, fixtures, examples and test tooling, including cs/src/cs/witness_placer/ and test files inside otherwise in-scope crates.
  • CLI orchestration and setup-generation utilities (zksync-airbender tools/cli/, zkos-wrapper wrapper/src/{interface,wrapper,gpu}/ and main.rs). These compute the verification key rather than determine it.
  • Native SIMD implementations of the base field (field/src/*avx*, field/src/*arm*) that are not part of the RISC-V recursion binary.
  • The Ethereum STF / Ethereum runner paths already listed above.
Default Out of Scope and rules

Blockchain/DLT specific

  • Incorrect data supplied by third party oracles
    • Not to exclude oracle manipulation/flash loan attacks
  • Impacts requiring basic economic and governance attacks (e.g. 51% attack)
  • Lack of liquidity impacts
  • Impacts from Sybil attacks
  • Impacts involving centralization risks

All categories

  • Impacts requiring attacks that the reporter has already exploited themselves, leading to damage
  • Impacts caused by attacks requiring access to leaked keys/credentials
  • Impacts caused by attacks requiring access to privileged addresses (including, but not limited to: governance and strategist contracts) without additional modifications to the privileges attributed
  • Impacts relying on attacks involving the depegging of an external stablecoin where the attacker does not directly cause the depegging due to a bug in code
  • Mentions of secrets, access tokens, API keys, private keys, etc. in Github will be considered out of scope without proof that they are in-use in production
  • Best practice recommendations
  • Feature requests
  • Impacts on test files and configuration files unless stated otherwise in the bug bounty program
  • Impacts requiring phishing or other social engineering attacks against project's employees and/or customers