Genius Yield
Program Overview
Genius Yield is the all-in-one DeFi platform, that combines an order-book decentralized exchange (DEX) with an AI-powered yield optimizer, built from the ground up on the Cardano blockchain and designed to take advantage of benefits provided by Cardano’s EUTxO smart contracts, such as security, determinism, parallelism, scalability, and composability.
The overarching objective is to democratize Decentralized Finance by providing an all-in-one, easy-to-use solution, and thus making this new domain accessible to everyone.
Genius Yield aims to provide a high level of security for their users. This bug bounty program offers the possibility for whitehats to report their findings and help us secure our DEX.
For more information about Genius Yield, please visit https://www.geniusyield.co/.
Genius Yield provides rewards in GENS. For more details about the payment process, please view the Rewards by Threat Level section further below.
Responsible Publication
Genius Yield adheres to category 3: Approval Required. This Policy determines what information whitehats are allowed to make public from their submitted bug reports. For more information about the category selected, please refer to our Responsible Publication page.
Primacy of Impact vs Primacy of Rules
Genius Yield adheres to the Primacy of Rules, which means that the whole bug bounty program is run strictly under the terms stated in this page.
Known Issue Assurance
Genius Yield commits to providing Known Issue Assurance to bug submissions through their program. This means that Genius Yield will either disclose known issues publicly or at the very least privately via a self-reported bug submission in order to allow for a more objective and streamlined mediation process to prove that an issue is known. Otherwise, assuming the bug report itself is valid, it would result in the bug report being considered in-scope and due 100% of the reward with respect to the bug bounty program terms.
Previous Audits
Genius Yield has provided these completed audit review reports for reference. Any unfixed vulnerability mentioned in these reports are not eligible for a reward.
Rewards by Threat Level
Rewards are distributed according to the impact the vulnerability could otherwise cause based on the Impacts in Scope table further below.
Reward Calculation for Critical Level Reports
Critical website and application bug reports will be rewarded with USD 15,000, only if the impact leads to a direct loss in funds involving an attack that does not require any user action at all. An impact of minting tokens on-chain beyond intended activity without requiring any user action would also be rewarded this amount due to the undesired dilution of existing circulating tokens. All other impacts that would be classified as Critical, or an impact resulting in a theft of funds that does not fall under this definition, would be rewarded USD 10,000.
Proof of Concept (PoC) Requirements
A PoC is required for the following severity levels:
- Website and Applications, Critical
- Website and Applications, High
- Smart Contract, Critical
- Smart Contract, High
All PoCs submitted must comply with the Immunefi-wide PoC Guidelines and Rules. Bug report submissions without a PoC, when a PoC is required, will not be provided with a reward.
Reward Payment Terms
Payouts are handled by the Genius Yield team directly and are denominated in USD. However, payments are done in GENS.
The calculation of the net amount rewarded is based on the average price between CoinMarketCap.com and CoinGecko.com at the time the bug report was submitted. No adjustments are made based on liquidity availability. For avoidance of doubt, if the reward amount is USD 5,000 and the average price is USD 0.20 per token, then the reward will be 25,000 units of GENS token.
Smart Contract
- Critical
- Level
- USD $25,000
- Payout
- High
- Level
- USD $10,000
- Payout
Websites and Applications
- Critical
- Level
- USD $10,000 to USD $15,000
- Payout
- High
- Level
- USD $4,000
- Payout
Assets in scope
- Smart Contract - Partial OrderType
- Smart Contract - NFTType
- Smart Contract - Special NFT for Partially Fillable OrdersType
- Smart Contract - Fee configurationType
- Websites and Applications - Main web appType
- Websites and Applications - APIType
Unless explicitly listed, only pages of the web/app assets in addition to the direct link are considered in-scope of the bug bounty program. Other subdomains are not considered as in-scope. However, for subdomain takeovers that lead to an impact on the in-scope asset, please refer to our page about Reported Subdomain Takeovers.
Impacts in scope
Only the following impacts are accepted within this bug bounty program. All other impacts are not considered as in-scope, even if they affect something in the assets in scope table.
Smart Contract
- Manipulation of governance voting result deviating from voted outcome and resulting in a direct change from intended effect of original resultsCriticalImpact
- Direct theft of any user funds, whether at-rest or in-motion, other than unclaimed yieldCriticalImpact
- Direct theft of any user NFTs, whether at-rest or in-motion, other than unclaimed royaltiesCriticalImpact
- Permanent freezing of fundsCriticalImpact
- Permanent freezing of NFTsCriticalImpact
- Unauthorized minting of NFTsCriticalImpact
- Predictable or manipulable RNG that results in abuse of the principal or NFTCriticalImpact
- Unintended alteration of what the NFT represents (e.g. token URI, payload, artistic content)CriticalImpact
- Protocol insolvencyCriticalImpact
- Theft of unclaimed yieldHighImpact
- Theft of unclaimed royaltiesHighImpact
- Permanent freezing of unclaimed yieldHighImpact
- Permanent freezing of unclaimed royaltiesHighImpact
- Temporary freezing of fundsHighImpact
- Temporary freezing NFTsHighImpact
Websites and Applications
- Retrieve sensitive data/files from a running server such as: /etc/shadow database passwords blockchain keys (this does not include non-sensitive environment variables, open source code, or usernames)CriticalImpact
- Taking down the application/websiteCriticalImpact
- Taking state-modifying authenticated actions (with or without blockchain state interaction) on behalf of other users without any interaction by that user, such as: Changing registration information Making trades WithdrawalsCriticalImpact
- Changing the NFT metadataCriticalImpact
- Subdomain takeover with already-connected wallet interactionCriticalImpact
- Direct theft of user fundsCriticalImpact
- Malicious interactions with an already-connected wallet such as: Modifying transaction arguments or parameters Substituting contract addresses Submitting malicious transactionsCriticalImpact
- Direct theft of user NFTsCriticalImpact
- Injection of malicious HTML or XSS through NFT metadataCriticalImpact
- Execute arbitrary system commandsCriticalImpact
- Injecting/modifying the static content on the target application without Javascript (Persistent) such as: HTML injection without Javascript Replacing existing text with arbitrary text Arbitrary file uploads, etcHighImpact
- Subdomain takeover without already-connected wallet interactionHighImpact
Out of Scope & Rules
All Categories:
- Impacts requiring attacks that the reporter has already exploited themselves, leading to damage
- Impacts caused by attacks requiring access to leaked keys/credentials
- Impacts caused by attacks requiring access to privileged addresses (governance, strategist) except in such cases where the contracts are intended to have no privileged access to functions that make the attack possible
- Impacts relying on attacks involving the depegging of an external stablecoin where the attacker does not directly cause the depegging due to a bug in code
- Mentions of secrets, access tokens, API keys, private keys, etc. in Github will be considered out of scope without proof that they are in-use in production
- Best practice recommendations
- Feature requests
- Impacts on test files and configuration files unless stated otherwise in the bug bounty program
Websites and Apps
- Theoretical impacts without any proof or demonstration
- Impacts involving attacks requiring physical access to the victim device
- Impacts involving attacks requiring access to the local network of the victim
- Reflected plain text injection (e.g. url parameters, path, etc.)
- This does not exclude reflected HTML injection with or without JavaScript
- This does not exclude persistent plain text injection
- Any impacts involving self-XSS
- Captcha bypass using OCR without impact demonstration
- CSRF with no state modifying security impact (e.g. logout CSRF)
- Impacts related to missing HTTP Security Headers (such as X-FRAME-OPTIONS) or cookie security flags (such as “httponly”) without demonstration of impact
- Server-side non-confidential information disclosure, such as IPs, server names, and most stack traces
- Impacts causing only the enumeration or confirmation of the existence of users or tenants
- Impacts caused by vulnerabilities requiring un-prompted, in-app user actions that are not part of the normal app workflows
- Lack of SSL/TLS best practices
- Impacts that only require DDoS
- UX and UI impacts that do not materially disrupt use of the platform
- Impacts primarily caused by browser/plugin defects
- Leakage of non sensitive API keys (e.g. Etherscan, Infura, Alchemy, etc.)
- Any vulnerability exploit requiring browser bugs for exploitation (e.g. CSP bypass)
- SPF/DMARC misconfigured records
- Missing HTTP Headers without demonstrated impact
- Automated scanner reports without demonstrated impact
- UI/UX best practice recommendations
- Non-future-proof NFT rendering
Smart contracts
- Incorrect data supplied by third party oracles (Not to exclude oracle manipulation/flash loan attacks)
- Impacts requiring basic economic and governance attacks (e.g. 51% attack)
- Lack of liquidity impacts
- Impacts from Sybil attacks
- Impacts involving centralization risks
- Best practice recommendations
Prohibited Activities:
- Any testing on mainnet or public testnet deployed code; all testing should be done on local-forks of either public testnet or mainnet
- Any testing with pricing oracles or third-party smart contracts
- Attempting phishing or other social engineering attacks against our employees and/or customers
- Any testing with third-party systems and applications (e.g. browser extensions) as well as websites (e.g. SSO providers, advertising networks)
- Any denial of service attacks that are executed against project assets
- Automated testing of services that generates significant amounts of traffic
- Public disclosure of an unpatched vulnerability in an embargoed bounty