Pantos
Pantos is a multichain token system, enabling tokens to exist on multiple blockchains and be freely transferable, thus unlocking the real superpowers of digital assets and making them technology-agnostic.
Triaged by Immunefi
PoC required
KYC required
Arbitration enabled
Rewards
Rewards by Threat Level
Mainnet assets:
Reward amount is 10% of the funds directly affected up to a maximum of:
$200,000Minimum reward to discourage security researchers from withholding a bug report:
$50,000Rewards are distributed according to the impact of the vulnerability based on the [Immunefi Vulnerability Severity Classification System V2.3][https://immunefi.com/immunefi-vulnerability-severity-classification-system-v2-3/].
Reward Calculation for Critical Level Reports
-
For critical smart contract bugs, the reward amount is 10% of the funds directly affected up to a maximum of USD 200K. The calculation of the amount of funds at risk is based on the time and date the bug report is submitted. However, a minimum reward of USD 50K is to be rewarded in order to incentivize security researchers against withholding a critical bug report.
-
For critical smart contract bugs on testnet assets, the reward is paid as a flat amount of 50K. This is because there are no actual funds at risk on the testnet, hence limits objective calculation.
-
For critical web/apps bug reports will be rewarded with 50K, only if the impact leads to:
- A loss of funds involving an attack that does not require any user action
- Private key or private key generation leakage leading to unauthorized access to user funds
All other impacts that would be classified as Critical would be rewarded a flat amount of 20K. The rest of the severity levels are paid out according to the Impact in Scope table.
Repeatable Attack Limitations
-
If the smart contract where the vulnerability exists can be upgraded or paused, only the initial attack will be considered for a reward. This is because the project can mitigate the risk of further exploitation by upgrading or pausing the component where the vulnerability exists. The reward amount will depend on the severity of the impact and the funds at risk.
-
For critical repeatable attacks on smart contracts that cannot be upgraded or paused, the project will consider the cumulative impact of the repeatable attacks for a reward. This is because the project cannot prevent the attacker from repeatedly exploiting the vulnerability until all funds are drained and/or other irreversible damage is done. Therefore, this warrants a reward equivalent to 10% of funds at risk, capped at the maximum critical reward.
Reward Calculation for High Level Reports
-
High vulnerabilities concerning theft/permanent freezing of unclaimed yield/royalties are rewarded within a range of 200K to 10K depending on the funds at risk, capped at the maximum high reward.
-
In the event of temporary freezing, the reward doubles from the full frozen value for every additional 24h that the funds are temporarily frozen, up until a max cap of the high reward. This is because as the duration of the freezing lengthens, the potential for greater damage and subsequent reputational harm intensifies. Thus, by increasing the reward proportionally with the frozen duration, the project ensures stronger incentives for bug disclosure of this nature.
Program Overview
Pantos is a multichain token system, enabling tokens to exist on multiple blockchains and be freely transferable, thus unlocking the real superpowers of digital assets and making them technology-agnostic.
For more information about Pantos, please visit https://pantos.io/.
Pantos provides rewards in USDT on Ethereum, denominated in USD. For more details about the payment process, please view the Rewards by Threat Level section further below.
Audits
KYC required
The submission of KYC information is a requirement for payout processing.
Proof of Concept
Proof of concept is always required for all severities.
Responsible Publication
Category 2: Notice Required
Prohibited Activities
- Any testing on mainnet or public testnet deployed code; all testing should be done on local-forks of either public testnet or mainnet
- Any testing with pricing oracles or third-party smart contracts
- Attempting phishing or other social engineering attacks against our employees and/or customers
- Any testing with third-party systems and applications (e.g. browser extensions) as well as websites (e.g. SSO providers, advertising networks)
- Any denial of service attacks that are executed against project assets
- Automated testing of services that generates significant amounts of traffic
- Public disclosure of an unpatched vulnerability in an embargoed bounty
- Any other actions prohibited by the Immunefi Rules
Feasibility Limitations
The project may be receiving reports that are valid (the bug and attack vector are real) and cite assets and impacts that are in scope, but there may be obstacles or barriers to executing the attack in the real world. In other words, there is a question about how feasible the attack really is. Conversely, there may also be mitigation measures that projects can take to prevent the impact of the bug, which are not feasible or would require unconventional action and hence, should not be used as reasons for downgrading a bug's severity.
Therefore, Immunefi has developed a set of feasibility limitation standards which by default states what security researchers, as well as projects, can or cannot cite when reviewing a bug report.