Triaged by Immunefi
PoC Required
KYC required
Rewards
Rewards by Threat Level
Mainnet assets:
Reward amount is 10% of the funds directly affected up to a maximum of:
$20,000Minimum reward to discourage security researchers from withholding a bug report:
$10,000Rewards by Threat Level
Reward Calculation for Critical Level Reports
- For critical smart contract bugs, the reward amount is 10% of the funds directly affected up to a maximum of USD 20 000.. The calculation of the amount of funds at risk is based on the time and date the bug report is submitted. However, a minimum reward of USD 10 000 is to be rewarded in order to incentivize security researchers against withholding a critical bug report.
Repeatable Attack Limitations
- If the smart contract where the vulnerability exists can be upgraded or paused, only the initial attack will be considered for a reward.
- The amount of funds at risk will be calculated with the impact of the first attack being at 100% and then a reduction of 25% from the amount of the first attack for every [300 blocks] the attack needs for subsequent attacks from the first attack, rounded down.
Reward Calculation for High Level Reports
- High impacts concerning theft/permanent freezing of unclaimed yield/royalties are rewarded within a range of USD 2500 to USD 7500. with the reward calculated based on 100% of the funds at risk, though capped at the maximum high reward.
- In the event of temporary freezing, the reward doubles from the full frozen value for every additional expirationTimestamp for a given Daimo Pay intent, that the funds are temporarily frozen, up until a max cap of the high reward.
The assets in scope for this bounty are specifically our Daimo Pay smart contracts.
Not in scope:
- Web app/SDK/JS issues. We are listing the test page (htts://pay.daimo.com/demo/tests) only as an aid for researchers to test and understand our contracts more quickly, not because we are looking for bugs in the test page itself.
Special case:
- 'DaimoPayRelayer'. This is an untrusted contract. Any issues that result in loss of user funds will be treated as critical, while issues resulting in loss of our own company funds in DaimoPayRelayer will be treated has high severity but not critical.
Program Overview
Daimo Pay is a intent-based system for crypto payments.
In particular, it supports fast 1:1 transfers from any major stablecoin across chains.
For an overview, see https://paydocs.daimo.com/how-it-works
To try it out yourself, see https://pay.daimo.com/demo/tests
The purpose of this bug bounty is to build confidence in the Daimo Pay intent address contract system.
We will treat all contract issues that result in loss of user funds as critical.
Temporarily frozen funds count only as vulnerabilities only if they occur 1. due to an error in our contracts, or 2. last longer than 'expirationTimestamp' for a given Daimo Pay intent.
There are a variety of (known, expected) ways that funds can be frozen temporarily due to user error (for example, double-paying the same intent address twice). These are not vulnerabilities.
Audits
Known Issues
KYC required
The submission of KYC information is a requirement for payout processing.
Proof of Concept
Proof of concept is always required for all severities.
Prohibited Activities
- Any testing on mainnet or public testnet deployed code; all testing should be done on local-forks of either public testnet or mainnet
- Any testing with pricing oracles or third-party smart contracts
- Attempting phishing or other social engineering attacks against our employees and/or customers
- Any testing with third-party systems and applications (e.g. browser extensions) as well as websites (e.g. SSO providers, advertising networks)
- Any denial of service attacks that are executed against project assets
- Automated testing of services that generates significant amounts of traffic
- Public disclosure of an unpatched vulnerability in an embargoed bounty
- Any other actions prohibited by the Immunefi Rules
Feasibility Limitations
The project may be receiving reports that are valid (the bug and attack vector are real) and cite assets and impacts that are in scope, but there may be obstacles or barriers to executing the attack in the real world. In other words, there is a question about how feasible the attack really is. Conversely, there may also be mitigation measures that projects can take to prevent the impact of the bug, which are not feasible or would require unconventional action and hence, should not be used as reasons for downgrading a bug's severity.
Therefore, Immunefi has developed a set of feasibility limitation standards which by default states what security researchers, as well as projects, can or cannot cite when reviewing a bug report.