SNS
Developer of blockchain technologies intended to provide consumers with a Web 3.0 identity. The company's primary product, Solana Name Service (SNS) provides a human-readable name that maps to an SOL address, thereby removing the barrier to entry and providing an identifiable address that can facilitate payments, efficiency, and overall user experience in the sphere.
PoC required
KYC required
Rewards
Rewards by Threat Level
Mainnet assets:
Reward amount is 10% of the funds directly affected up to a maximum of:
$100,000Payouts are handled by the SNS team directly and are denominated in USD. However, payments are done in FIDA.
The calculation of the net amount rewarded is based on the average price between CoinMarketCap.com and CoinGecko.com at the time the bug report was submitted. No adjustments are made based on liquidity availability. For avoidance of doubt, if the reward amount is USD 5 000 and the average price is USD 1.75 per token, then the reward will be 2857.142857 units of that token.
Program Overview
Developer of blockchain technologies intended to provide consumers with a Web 3.0 identity. The company's primary product, Solana Name Service (SNS) provides a human-readable name that maps to an SOL address, thereby removing the barrier to entry and providing an identifiable address that can facilitate payments, efficiency, and overall user experience in the sphere.
For more information about SNS, please visit https://sns.id
SNS provides rewards in FIDA. For more details about the payment process, please view the Rewards by Threat Level section further below.
KYC Requirement
The provision of KYC is required to receive a reward for this bug bounty program where the following information will be required to be provided:
- Wallet address where you’ll receive payment;
- Proof of address (either a redacted bank statement with your address or a recent utility bill with your name, address, and issuer of the bill);
- Copy of your passport will be required.
KYC information is only required on confirmation of the validity of a bug report.
Primacy of Impact vs Primacy of Rules
SNS adheres to the Primacy of Impact for the following impacts:
- Smart Contract - Critical
- Smart Contract - High
- Smart Contract - Medium
- Smart Contract - Low
- Websites & Applications - Critical
- Websites & Applications - High
- Websites & Applications - Medium
- Websites & Applications - Low
If an impact is covered within the Primacy of Impact, it means that even if the impacted asset is not in-scope but is owned by the project, then it would be considered as in-scope of the bug bounty program. When submitting a report, just select the Primacy of Impact asset placeholder. If the team behind this project has multiple projects, those other projects are not covered under the Primacy of Impact of this program. Instead, check if those other projects have a bug bounty program on Immunefi.
All other impacts are considered under the Primacy of Rules, which means that they are bound by the terms of the bug bounty program.
All other severity levels not listed here are considered under the Primacy of Rules, which means that they are bound by the terms of the bug bounty program.
Known Issue Assurance
SNS commits to providing Known Issue Assurance to bug submissions through their program. This means that SNS will either disclose known issues publicly or at the very least privately via a self-reported bug submission in order to allow for a more objective and streamlined mediation process to prove that an issue is known. Otherwise, assuming the bug report itself is valid, it would result in the bug report being considered in-scope and due 100% of the reward with respect to the bug bounty program terms.
Immunefi Standard Badge
SNS has satisfied the requirements for the Immunefi Standard Badge, which is given to projects that adhere to our best practices.
Repeatable Attack Limitations
In cases of repeatable attacks for smart contract bugs, only the first attack will be counted, regardless of whether the smart contract is upgradable, pausable, or killable.
Restrictions on Security Researcher Eligibility
Security researchers who fall under any of the following are ineligible for a reward
- OFAC-sanctioned countries residents are ineligible
- OFAC-sanctioned individuals are ineligible
Proof of Concept (PoC) Requirements
A PoC is required for the following severity levels:
- Smart Contract - Critical - PoC Required
- Smart Contract - High - PoC Required
- Smart Contract - Medium - PoC Required
- Smart Contract - Low - PoC Required
- Website & Applications - Critical - PoC Required
- Website & Applications - High - PoC Required
- Website & Applications - Medium - PoC Required
- Website & Applications - Low - PoC Required
All PoCs submitted must comply with the Immunefi-wide PoC Guidelines and Rules. Bug report submissions without a PoC when a PoC is required will not be provided with a reward
KYC required
The submission of KYC information is a requirement for payout processing.
Proof of Concept
Proof of concept is always required for all severities.
Responsible Publication
Category 3: Approval Required
Prohibited Activities
- Any testing on mainnet or public testnet deployed code; all testing should be done on local-forks of either public testnet or mainnet
- Any testing with pricing oracles or third-party smart contracts
- Attempting phishing or other social engineering attacks against our employees and/or customers
- Any testing with third-party systems and applications (e.g. browser extensions) as well as websites (e.g. SSO providers, advertising networks)
- Any denial of service attacks that are executed against project assets
- Automated testing of services that generates significant amounts of traffic
- Public disclosure of an unpatched vulnerability in an embargoed bounty
- Any other actions prohibited by the Immunefi Rules
Feasibility Limitations
The project may be receiving reports that are valid (the bug and attack vector are real) and cite assets and impacts that are in scope, but there may be obstacles or barriers to executing the attack in the real world. In other words, there is a question about how feasible the attack really is. Conversely, there may also be mitigation measures that projects can take to prevent the impact of the bug, which are not feasible or would require unconventional action and hence, should not be used as reasons for downgrading a bug's severity.
Therefore, Immunefi has developed a set of feasibility limitation standards which by default states what security researchers, as well as projects, can or cannot cite when reviewing a bug report.